And we don't mean his dad. We mean Gwen. And we don't mean that his nails are chipped. Far from it. Here he is, sitting under the dryer after getting a mani/pedi with mom.
Now, we're sure people are going to get all judgey about a four-year-old boy wearing glitter nail polish. Hell, there are people who'd get judgey even if Kingston were a girl.
Not us! We're an equal-opportunity-glitter group.
But we do wonder about one thing. We always thought that story about a woman dyeing her kid's hair to make her own color look more natural was an urban legend.
But apparently not.
What do you think--does Kingston's hair have that loving-hands-at-home Sun-In vibe? Or is there a salon employee somewhere who's dying to be outed at Gwen Stefani's son's colorist?
--
Photos courtesy of D-Listed.
I am judging. I don't have a problem with glittery polish for all, including boys. Why not sit around at home painting your toes and fingers, though? Why do you have to go out and be photographed, and who in the world would spend kind of money for a mani/pedi for a small child who will have it ruined before lunch?
At first I thought, in relation to Carol's comment "Eh... it's $25 tops... it's nothing to her." Then I realized there is no freaking way in hell she goes into a place where manis or pedis are only $25 or $30....
And maybe... just maybe... he was only sitting there playing around waiting on mom to get done...?